Strasbourg Observers
  • Philipp Schönberger

E.A. and H.A.A. v. Greece: A U-Turn on Reception Conditions in Greek ‘Hotspots’

October 17, 2025

by Philipp Schönberger1 The European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) inadmissibility decision in E.A. and H.A.A. v. Greece published on 4 September 2025 marks a potential turning point in its assessment of asylum seekers’ reception conditions in the Greek ‘hotspots.’ The case signals a regressive shift in the Court’s jurisprudence, one that lacks sound justification, but fits […]

  • Sam Chollet

A (binary) right to self-determination: T.H. v. Czech Republic

October 14, 2025

by Sam Chollet In T.H. v. Czech Republic, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) reiterated that the requirement for trans* people to undergo genital surgery to have their gender legally recognised violates the right to private life. But this apparent victory for trans* rights represents a drawback for non-binary trans* people. Summary of the […]

  • Emilie Weible, Claudio Cerqueira, Marjolaine Viret

The Legal Implications of the Semenya Ruling from a Swiss perspective

October 10, 2025

Emilie Weible, Claudio Cerqueira, Dr. Marjolaine Viret *** This is the final post in our symposium on the ECtHR Grand Chamber ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. An introduction to the symposium and the case can be found here. *** Introduction On 11 July […]

  • Faraz Shahlaei & Antoine Duval

The Elephant in the Room: The Grand Chamber and the independence of the CAS

October 09, 2025

Dr. Faraz Shahlaei & Dr. Antoine Duval *** Between the first and the eight of October, the Strasbourg Observers blog is hosting a symposium examining various aspects of the ECtHR’s ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. An introduction to the symposium and the case […]

  • Daniela Heerdt

Access to Remedy in the Grand Chamber’s Semenya v. Switzerland Decision

October 08, 2025

by Daniela Heerdt *** Between the first and the eight of October, the Strasbourg Observers blog is hosting a symposium examining various aspects of the ECtHR’s ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. An introduction to the symposium and the case can be found here. […]

  • Daniel Reitiker

Contextualizing Semenya: The current and future role of the European Court of Human Rights in sports

October 07, 2025

Dr. Daniel Rietiker *** Between the first and the eight of October, the Strasbourg Observers blog is hosting a symposium examining various aspects of the ECtHR’s ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. An introduction to the symposium and the case can be found here. […]

  • Lena Holzer

A Human Rights Analysis of Semenya and its Potential Effects on the Rights of Transgender Athletes

October 06, 2025

Dr. Lena Holzer *** Between the first and the eight of October, the Strasbourg Observers blog is hosting a symposium examining various aspects of the ECtHR’s ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. An introduction to the symposium and the case can be found here. *** […]

  • Michele Krech

The Semenya Judgment and Women’s Eligibility in Sport: Nothing Changes, Everything Does!

October 03, 2025

Dr. Michele Krech1 *** Between the first and the eight of October, the Strasbourg Observers blog is hosting a symposium examining various aspects of the ECtHR’s ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. An introduction to the symposium and the case can be found here. […]

  • Sarah Thin

Deterritorialising Semenya: Jurisdiction and Extraterritoriality in the Grand Chamber judgment

October 02, 2025

Dr. Sarah Thin *** Between the first and the eight of October, the Strasbourg Observers blog is hosting a symposium examining various aspects of the ECtHR’s ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. An introduction to the symposium and the case can be found here. […]

  • Antoine Duval and Faraz Shahlaei

Examining the Grand Chamber’s Ruling in Semenya v Switzerland: Introducing the Symposium

October 01, 2025

Dr. Antoine Duval & Dr. Faraz Shahlaei1 *** Between the first and the eight of October, the Strasbourg Observers blog is hosting a symposium examining various aspects of the ECtHR’s ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. This first post in the symposium aims to […]

  • Costas Paraskeva and Eleni Meleagrou

The quest for an effective remedy has downgraded the rights to property and home of the Greek Cypriot IDPs and upgraded the de facto authority of the illegal regime in the north of Cyprus (‘TRNC’): K.V. Mediterranean Tours Limited v. Türkiye, the Court’s latest judgment 

September 30, 2025

By Dr Costas Paraskeva and Eleni Meleagrou Introduction On June 10, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (‘The Court’) delivered its judgment in the case of K.V. Mediterranean Tours Limited v. Türkiye . This is the fourth time that the Court has reviewed the domestic remedy set up by Türkiye, within its subordinate administration of […]

  • Gvantsa Danelia

Beyond the Finding: Matchavariani v. Georgia and the Lingering Questions for Protest Adjudication in Georgia

September 26, 2025

by Gvantsa Danelia The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) recently delivered its judgment in Matchavariani v. Georgia (Application no. 46852/21). At first glance, the case might seem like another routine finding of a violation in an administrative detention case. However, a closer examination reveals a subtle yet crucial message from Strasbourg, particularly concerning a […]

  • Akiko Ejima

Significance of the Strasbourg Human Rights Case Law Beyond Europe – The Impact of the ECHR Jurisprudence on Asian Apex Courts

September 23, 2025

By dr. Akiko Ejima *** To celebrate the 15th anniversary of the Strasbourg Observers Blog, we organised an in-person symposium with scholars, practitioners, and members of the ECtHR on 8–9 May 2025 in Ghent. Connecting in person with so many regular contributors was a wonderful experience and led to engaging dialogue with current and former […]

  • Dimitrios Kagiaros

Backović v. Serbia (no. 2): Blurring the line between legitimate criticism and unacceptable insults by lawyers in court proceedings

September 19, 2025

By Dimitrios Kagiaros In Backović v. Serbia (no. 2), the European Court of Human Rights’ third section (henceforth ECtHR or the Court) revisited the thorny issue of lawyers making inappropriate or caustic remarks towards judges in court proceedings. In a 5-2 judgment, the Court found that a fine for contempt of court against a lawyer […]

  • Florian Kriener

Russ v Germany: On broad definitions in the regulation of peaceful assemblies

September 16, 2025

By Florian Kriener The right to assemble peacefully as guaranteed by Article 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) is essential in any democracy. It protects the right of a democracy’s citizens to unite and publicly demand changes in public policy. Peaceful assemblies and protests are therefore widely recognized for their role in […]

  • Dr. Alice Dejean de la Bâtie

Ludes v. France: The imperative of a strong necessity test to counter the criminalisation of protest

September 12, 2025

By Dr. Alice Dejean de la Bâtie The events that led to the case of Ludes and Others v. France began in early 2019, when climate activists, mostly affiliated with the French environmental campaign Action Non-Violente COP21, launched a coordinated protest under the banner #DécrochonsMacron (“Take Down Macron”). Their objective was both symbolic and strategic: […]

  • Giorgi Nakashidze

Not Afraid of International Humanitarian Law Anymore: the European Court of Human Rights after Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia

September 09, 2025

By Dr. Giorgi Nakashidze The European Court of Human Rights’ (“Court”) judgment of 9 July 2025 in Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia (‘Judgment’) marks a milestone in the Court’s evolving engagement with international humanitarian law (IHL). Although the Judgment raises numerous issues deserving of detailed analysis (see e.g. Milanović, Risini, Khachatryan), this post focuses […]

  • Alex Geraki Trimi

Asking migrants to document their killing: Almukhlas and Al-Maliki v. Greece

September 05, 2025

by Alex Geraki Trimi The case of Almukhlas and Al-Maliki v. Greece concerned the interception of a yacht carrying 94 migrants near the Greek island of Symi by members of the Greek Coast Guard and Frontex (under the Joint operation Poseidon) that resulted in the killing of a child of Iraqi nationality, Ameer, by the […]

  • Jerome Joseph

Fanning the flames of social unrest: reflections on Vyacheslavova and others v. Ukraine and the regulation of online disinformation

September 02, 2025

By Jerome Joseph The case of Vyacheslavova and others v. Ukraine stems from an incident of civil unrest which occurred in Odesa on 2 May 2014 and which claimed 48 lives. Released in March 2025, the case appears to have escaped the same level of academic attention which followed Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia […]

  • Georgios Serghides

Stereotyped narratives on migration: Is the ECtHR’s reasoning stereotype-proof?

August 29, 2025

by Georgios A. Serghides[i] *** A note from the team: To celebrate the 15th anniversary of the Strasbourg Observers Blog, we organised an in-person symposium with scholars, practitioners, and members of the ECtHR on 8–9 May 2025 in Ghent. Connecting in person with so many regular contributors was a wonderful experience and led to engaging […]

1 2 3 57