January 24, 2023
By Dr Alice Margaria What is the role of and what is expected of a (legal) father? From a legal perspective, this question that goes well beyond the scope of family law, and the recent judgment in Beeler v Switzerland, decided by the Grand Chamber on 11 October 2022, is a case in point. In […]
January 19, 2023
Read moreDecember 23, 2022
by Nikos Koumoutzis Since 2014, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has been hearing cross-border surrogacy cases concerning the right to recognition of parentage of the child with its intended parents within the framework of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). A fairly large number of such cases have been reported already, and […]
December 20, 2022
by Péter Kállai On 10 November 2022, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) decided that the shortcomings of the minority voting system in Hungary constitute a violation of the right to vote under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 in conjunction with the right to non-discrimination under Article 14 of the European Convention on […]
December 16, 2022
by Bea Streicher Racial profiling constitutes a specific form of racial discrimination, which the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) defines as “use by the police, with no objective or reasonable justification, of grounds such as ‘race’, colour, language, religion, citizenship or national or ethnic origin in control, surveillance or investigation activities” (ECRI General […]
December 13, 2022
By Dr. Sjors Ligthart Introduction De Legé v. the Netherlands revolved around the privilege against self-incrimination. Regardless of the disadvantage suffered by the applicant, the Court considered it necessary to examine the application out of respect for human rights within the meaning of Article 35(3)(b) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). In […]
Strasbourg Observers is an academic blog that discusses recent developments at the European Court of Human Rights. The editorial team of Strasbourg Observers is based at the Human Rights Centre of Ghent University and the Centre for Government and Law of Hasselt University.
Strasbourg Observers would not be possible without the valued work of countless guest bloggers. Visit the “Contact” page on our website to find out how to become one!
My take on Beeler v🇨🇭
You will find a bit of everyth in this post:
my longstanding obsession for legal fatherhood & gender eq 🤣 but also trace of my recent attempt to 'go beyond judgments' + some final anthropologically-informed words on law & society as co-constitutive spheres https://twitter.com/StrasbourgObse1/status/1617918875580137472
In today's post, @AliceMargaria analyses the @ECHR_CEDH's approach to fatherhood and stereotypes in the GC case of Beeler v Switzerland, applauding its increasing protection of fathers as caregivers and reflecting on further steps to achieve gender justice http://strasbourgobservers.com/2023/01/24/freeing-fatherhood-from-breadwinning-are-we-ready-for-formal-equality-beeler-v-switzerland/
In today's post, @AliceMargaria analyses the @ECHR_CEDH's approach to fatherhood and stereotypes in the GC case of Beeler v Switzerland, applauding its increasing protection of fathers as caregivers and reflecting on further steps to achieve gender justice http://strasbourgobservers.com/2023/01/24/freeing-fatherhood-from-breadwinning-are-we-ready-for-formal-equality-beeler-v-switzerland/
The right answer without a reasonable argument? In today's post, Professor Balázs Majtényi criticised the shortcomings of @ECHR_CEDH in Bakirdzi and E.C. v. #Hungary concerning the representation of national minorities in the Hungarian Parliament
https://strasbourgobservers.com/2023/01/19/the-right-answer-without-a-reasonable-argument-the-shortcomings-of-bakirdzi-and-e-c-v-hungary/
December 02, 2022
By Jean-Baptiste Farcy The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ordered interim measures against Belgium for failing to offer material receptions conditions to 149 asylum-seekers. In the past year, the Belgian government has failed to provide shelter to asylum-seekers due to an alleged lack of reception facilities. Thousands of domestic judgments have also been disregarded […]
November 29, 2022
by Christopher Cowan M.T. and Others v. Sweden concerned the complete suspension of family reunification in Sweden between July 2016 and July 2019 for individuals granted subsidiary-protection status (like the applicants), in contrast to individuals granted refugee status. In a six-one ruling the Court held that there had been no violation of Article 8 in […]
November 23, 2022
By Joseph Finnerty[*] Introduction The rule of law crisis in Poland is not new, but the engagement of Article 18 ECHR with this context is. In Juszczyszyn v. Poland, the ECtHR delivered its first Article 18 violation judgment against Poland. The case concerned the legal reforms that the Polish political ruling party (PiS) has adopted […]
November 15, 2022
Introduction On October 11th 2022, the third section of the Strasbourg Court delivered an important judgment in the case of Pavlov and Others v Russia (Application no. 31612/09), concerning air pollution, which will hopefully prove to have great ramifications for pending and future environmental and climate cases. In short, the majority spelled out that the […]
November 10, 2022
By Serde Atalay and Vladislava Stoyanova When exactly does an eviction occur according to the Strasbourg Court? In Jansons v Latvia (application no. 1434/14), this question lurks behind the majority’s reasoning and the dissenting opinion of Judge O’Leary. This case is one of the “verticalized” cases brought before the Court, concerning, in essence, a private […]
November 08, 2022
by Mathias Möschel On 18 October 2022, the Third Section of the Strasbourg Court, decided two cases dealing for the first time with the question of whether and how far racial profiling by public authorities constitutes a violation of the Convention. The outcome is a mixed one. Whereas in Basu v. Germany the judges held […]
November 01, 2022
By Sanna Mustasaari The long-awaited Grand Chamber judgement in the case of H.F. and Others v. France addressed the refusal by France to repatriate the daughters and grandchildren of the applicants, all French nationals, from Syrian camps. The question of whether States should assume responsibility for their nationals, particularly children, who have been detained in […]
October 28, 2022
By Cathérine Van de Graaf On the 12th of September, the Human Rights Centre[1] (HRC) of Ghent University (Belgium) submitted a third party intervention (TPI) before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or the Court) in the communicated case of Missaoui and Akhandaf v. Belgium, after being granted leave to intervene by the President […]
October 21, 2022
by Tommaso Virgili In the case Rabczewska v. Poland, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) held that the conviction of a Polish woman due to her blasphemous statements against the Bible violated her rights under Article 10 of the Convention. This case stands in contrast with the recent E.S. v. Austria, where the Court […]
October 18, 2022
In September 2022, the European Court of Human Rights handed down its decision in Thevenon v France, rejecting as inadmissible a challenge to the workplace vaccination requirements enforced following the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic in France. That such an application would be declared inadmissible is not at all novel and represents something of a […]
