Strasbourg Observers

View posts from: Uncategorized

  • Gehan Gunatilleke

Distinguishing Permissibility from Proportionality: A Critical Assessment of Tsaava & Others v Georgia

May 19, 2026

by Gehan Gunatilleke In December 2025, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights delivered an important judgment in the case of Tsaava & Others v Georgia, Application Nos. 13186/20 and Four Others (2025). In this article, I examine the Court’s assessment of the interference with the applicants’ freedom of expression. I argue […]

  • Strasbourg Observers

Conference 22 May on revisiting the ECHR and the Chişinǎu process: open for registration

April 20, 2026

What began as an open letter in May 2025 has evolved into an increasingly articulate call by a broad group of European leaders to revisit and reform the European Convention on Human Rights, particularly in relation to migration. This initiative has set in motion a reform process leading up to the May 2026 Chişinău meeting […]

  • David Mier Galera

Strasbourg against the enemies of democracy: The protection of judicial immunity in Morawiec v. Poland

April 10, 2026

By Dr. David Mier Galera Over the last decade, several Central and Eastern European countries have successively elected leaders who reject democratic values. These politicians claim the legitimacy of their popular mandate to dismantle a so-called corrupt elite and portray migrants as an existential threat to the nation’s identity. Abusing their majority mandate, they introduce […]

  • Türkan Ertuna Lagrand

Building on Strasbourg: The ECtHR’s Gender Identity Case-Law in the CJEU’s Shipova Judgment

March 27, 2026

Dr. Türkan Ertuna Lagrand[1] Introduction On 12 March 2026, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) rendered its long awaited judgment in the Shipova case (Case C‑43/24), which breaks new ground in the realm of European Citizenship Law, as well as significantly improves the rights of transgender persons in the EU. The case concerns […]

  • Beril Önder

Article 14 and Equal Pay: The Court Confronts Retaliatory Dismissal in Ortega Ortega v. Spain

March 13, 2026

by Dr. Beril Önder In the case of Ortega Ortega v. Spain (4 December 2025), the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or the Court) delivered a significant judgment concerning a highly relevant issue for gender equality: effective judicial protection against discrimination on the grounds of sex in the context of employment and equal remuneration.  […]

  • PODCAST

Climate change litigation at the Strasbourg Court with Corina Heri

February 23, 2026

We’re excited to bring you closer to the European Court of Human Rights through our brand-new podcast. Join us as we explore key judgments, discuss emerging legal trends, and talk with experts and academics who help make sense of Strasbourg’s evolving jurisprudence. Whether you’re a seasoned legal scholar or just curious about human rights in […]

  • Zelal Pelin Doğan

Redressing or Acknowledging Human Rights Violations? The Roles of the ECtHR in the Otegi Cases

January 06, 2026

by Zelal Pelin Doğan When the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) finds that a Convention right has been violated, what does that finding ultimately secure for the individual concerned? Does it restore the applicant, as far as possible, to the position they would have occupied absent the violation, or does it increasingly function as […]

  • Donatas Murauskas

Delayed effect, immediate consequences: reflections on A.R. v. Poland

December 23, 2025

by Donatas Murauskas On 13 November 2025, the European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in A.R. v. Poland. The case concerned the Polish legal framework governing the prohibition of abortion on the ground of foetal abnormality, as well as the 2020 ruling of the Polish Constitutional Court, which effectively restricted access to abortion. […]

  • Ufuk Yeşil

The ECHR Judgment in Abo v. Turkey: An Analysis of Judicial Resistance, Legal Certainty, and the Limits of Constitutional Review 

December 09, 2025

by Dr. Ufuk Yeşil Introduction: Remedying Violations and the Critical Role of the Retrial Mechanism The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), acting as the ultimate supranational authority monitoring whether member states fulfil their obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), regards the effective implementation of its judgments within domestic law not […]

  • PODCAST

PODCAST – Russia’s Exit from the Council of Europe with Philip Leach

December 03, 2025

We’re excited to bring you closer to the European Court of Human Rights through our brand-new podcast. Join us as we explore key judgments, discuss emerging legal trends, and talk with experts and academics who help make sense of Strasbourg’s evolving jurisprudence. Whether you’re a seasoned legal scholar or just curious about human rights in […]

  • Margarita S. Ilieva

Ilareva and Others v. Bulgaria: First finding of discrimination by association (procedural) for unremedied online attacks on human rights defenders

December 02, 2025

By Margarita S. Ilieva On 9 September 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (the Court), in Ilareva and Others v. Bulgaria for the first time applied the concept of discrimination by association to human rights defenders (HRDs) targeted by hate speech due to their activism. It found a procedural breach because of a stunted […]

  • Strasbourg Observers

Call for Abstracts – Revisiting the ECHR: A Closer Look at Calls for Change

November 25, 2025

**As of September 2025, The Human Rights Research Group at KU Leuven has affiliated with the Human Rights Centre at Ghent University as partners of the Strasbourg Observers blog** Date Conference: 22 May 2026 Location: University of Leuven (Belgium) Conveners: Leuven Centre for Public Law – Human Rights Research Group Keynote speaker: Prof. Başak Çalı […]

  • Faraz Shahlaei & Antoine Duval

The Elephant in the Room: The Grand Chamber and the independence of the CAS

October 09, 2025

Dr. Faraz Shahlaei & Dr. Antoine Duval *** Between the first and the eight of October, the Strasbourg Observers blog is hosting a symposium examining various aspects of the ECtHR’s ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. An introduction to the symposium and the case […]

  • Babette De Naeyer

Bye, Bye, Appleby? Google v. Russia as First Cracks in the Forum Doctrine

August 06, 2025

by Babette De Naeyer Remember 2003? “Metrosexual” was the word of the year, Outkast’s “Hey Ya!” was everywhere, and “Finding Nemo” captivated younger audiences. In the legal world, 2003 also saw the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR, the Court) deliver its landmark Appleby a.o. v. UK ruling. In Appleby, the Court had to balance […]

  • Lorena Sosa

From institutionalisation to exploitation: structural failures and stereotyping in I.C. v. The Republic of Moldova

July 02, 2025

By Lorena Sosa The case of I.C. v. The Republic of Moldova intersects with two strands of ECtHR jurisprudence: (1) the Court’s developing understanding of sexual violence, rape and sexual exploitation, and (2) its evolving anti-stereotyping framework, particularly regarding persons with disabilities. Against the backdrop of landmark rulings, this judgment further enriches the Court’s often […]

  • Anıl Güven YÜKSEL

Political Expression and Representation in Regional Parliaments Within the Framework of Constitutional Order: a Critical Reading of the Inadmissibility Decision in Costa i Rosselló and Others v. Spain

May 13, 2025

Dr. Anıl Güven Yüksel In Costa i Rosselló and Others v. Spain, delivered on 27 February 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) declared the applications inadmissible, reaffirming the compatibility of protecting constitutional order with the Convention framework. The case concerned several members of the Catalan Parliament who challenged enforcement measures—and, in some instances, […]

  • Ellen Desmet, Ilse Derluyn and Sara Lembrechts

A mixed assessment on age assessment: F.B. v. Belgium

May 09, 2025

By Ellen Desmet, Ilse Derluyn and Sara Lembrechts F.B. v. Belgium concerns the decision of the Belgian Guardianship Service to terminate the support of an unaccompanied minor following an age assessment. While the ECtHR found a violation of Article 8 ECHR due to a lack of sufficient safeguards, it did not substantively engage with the […]

  • Strasbourg Observers

Strasbourg Observers 15th Anniversary Symposium: Call for papers

October 14, 2024

8-9 May 2025, Ghent  Founded in April 2010, the Strasbourg Observers Blog is soon celebrating its 15th Anniversary. At this occasion, we are organizing a symposium in Ghent, Belgium. This symposium will be an occasion for real-life exchange between the blog’s readers, contributors and the current and former members of its editorial team. At the […]

  • Júlia Miklasová

The Conflation of Jurisdiction and Attribution Tests, the ‘Law,’ and the International Legal Status of Abkhazia and South Ossetia: A Review of Recent ECtHR Case Law

August 23, 2024

By Júlia Miklasová This blog features an analysis of the common threads that link three recent ECtHR judgments related to the Russia-controlled parts of Georgian territory – the de facto entities of Abkhazia and South Ossetia –with the Court’s existing case law. Particularly, the blog focuses on the conflation of the jurisdiction and attribution tests, […]

  • Eva Brems

The single judge and the single-sentence motivation (1): The Sloppy Decision in Deleuran v. Denmark

April 09, 2024

Eva Brems ‘The European Court as the main violator of human rights’, it said on a PowerPoint slide in my ECHR class this semester. This was a presentation by a guest speaker: an attorney with a lot of experience with ECtHR procedures. I had simply invited him to talk about this experience, but he had […]

1 2