The results of our poll on best and worst ECtHR judgment of 2015 are in! We are excited to announce the results now that exactly a month has passed since the opening of the polls.
In the category of best judgment, celebrating the best the ECtHR had to offer in 2015, the top three are:
Bouyid v. Belgium: 29%
Oliari and Others v. Italy: 27%
Khlaifia and Others v. Italy: 20%
In the category of worst judgment, indicating that there is always room for improvement, the top three are:
Ebrahimian v. France: 26%
Pentikäinen v. Finland: 23%
A.S. v. Switzerland: 18%
Thanks for voting. We already look forward to next year’s edition of the poll!
And how many different people have cast their vote? How many votes does a 29% or 26% mean?
Total number of votes cast = 400 (filtered by IP address to reduce as much as possible double voting)
[…] Das Urteil Bouyid v. Belgien ist soeben von den Leser_innen des Blogs Stasbourg Observers zum besten EGMR-Urteil des Jahres 2015 gewählt […]
[…] Observers has announced the results of its annual poll for the best and worst ECtHR judgment of 2015. There were two “law & […]
[…] by human rights advocators – and, besides, featured also in the Top Three of this blog’s poll for Best ECtHR Judgement for 2015 – as it upheld considerably the protection of migrants’ […]