Strasbourg Observers

View posts from: Uncategorized

  • Strasbourg Observers

The Best and Worst ECtHR judgments of 2020 are…

March 05, 2021

Dear readers, About a month ago, we presented you with a shortlist of candidates for the awards of best and worst ECtHR judgments of 2020 (see our previous blogpost). We would like to thank everybody who participated in the vote. It is our pleasure to announce the results of the poll today. In the category of […]

  • Guest Blogger

Trivkanović v. Croatia: About rigidity, reopening and proof of forced disappearances

February 15, 2021

By Lize R. Glas, Assistant Professor of European law, Radboud University, the Netherlands.  Introduction The judgment in the case of Trivkanović v. Croatia (no. 2) (21 January 2021, nr. 54916/16) provides a good illustration of the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR; Court) at times flexible approach towards the rules that it has created in its judgments. In […]

  • Strasbourg Observers

Poll: Best and Worst ECtHR Judgment of 2020

January 29, 2021

Dear readers, At Strasbourg Observers, we always like to seize the opportunity of the beginning of the new year to look back at the previous one. 2020 has been a strange year. Last year, many members from our scholarly community dropped their ordinary research activities to keep us, via Strasbourg Observers, up to do date […]

  • Laurens Lavrysen

New publication: Coercive Human Rights – Positive Duties to Mobilise the Criminal Law under the ECHR

November 12, 2020

I’m excited to announce the publication of ‘Coercive Human Rights – Positive Duties to Mobilise the Criminal Law under the ECHR’ by Hart Publishing. In this book, which was edited by Natasa Mavronicola (University of Birmingham) and myself, a whole host of esteemed scholars discuss the development by the European Court of Human Rights of […]

  • Guest Blogger

Human Rights Centre submits a third party intervention in case concerning the right to family life of transgender parents and their children

July 08, 2020

Judith Vermeulen is a doctoral researcher and a member of the Law & Technology research group, the Human Rights Centre and PIXELS at Ghent University. The Human Rights Centre of Ghent University (Belgium)[1] submitted a third party intervention (TPI) before the European Court of Human Rights in the communicated case of A.M. and Others v. […]

  • Strasbourg Observers

Event Announcement: Conference “The ECHR turns 70: Taking Stock, Thinking Forward” postponed to 24-26 November 2021

June 22, 2020

We are delighted that our call for papers has attracted a huge interest from all over the world and we would like to thank everyone who submitted an abstract. In view of the Corona crisis, we are moving the Conference to 24-26 November 2021. This will enable our participants to meet face to face which […]

  • Guest Blogger

The right to education in Transdniestria seven years after Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia: are we there yet?

April 20, 2020

By Linda Hamid, Research Fellow at the Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies – Institute for International Law, KU Leuven On 4 December 2019, during a research stay in the Republic of Moldova, I travelled to the village of Doroțcaia, where I visited the ‘Ștefan cel Mare și Sfânt’ lyceum and met with the principal, […]

  • Guest Blogger

The Court’s first ruling on Roma’s access to safe water and sanitation in Hudorovic et al. v. Slovenia: reasons for hope and worry

April 09, 2020

This blogpost is written by Valeska David who is an Affiliated Researcher at the Human Rights Centre of Ghent University and Assistant Professor of International Law at University of Navarra. She has recently published the book ‘Cultural Difference and Economic Disadvantage in Regional Human Rights Courts: An Integrated View’ (Intersentia, 2020). On 10 March 2020, […]

  • Strasbourg Observers

Reminder: Conference “The ECHR Turns 70 – Taking Stock, Thinking Forward”

March 20, 2020

In these disturbing times for all of us, we at the Ghent University’s Human Rights Centre are really looking forward to seeing all of you, the ECHR community, again once all of this is over. On 18-20 November 2020, we’re organizing a conference to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the European Convention on Human Rights, […]

  • Strasbourg Observers

The Best and Worst ECtHR judgments of 2019 are…

March 02, 2020

Dear readers, About a month ago, we presented you with a shortlist of candidates for the awards of best and worst ECtHR judgments of 2019 (see our previous blog post). We would like to thank everybody who participated in the vote. It is our pleasure to announce the results of the poll today. In the […]

  • Strasbourg Observers

Poll: Best and Worst ECtHR Judgment of 2019

January 29, 2020

Dear readers, As the Grand Chamber made clear in the (in)famous Lautsi case, “the decision whether or not to perpetuate a tradition falls in principle within the margin of appreciation”. Exercising our discretion in this respect, we hereby decide to perpetuate our tradition of celebrating the start of the New Year with the launch of […]

  • Strasbourg Observers

Call for papers: Conference “The ECHR Turns 70 – Taking Stock, Thinking Forward”

January 24, 2020

The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, better known as the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), was opened for signature in Rome on 4 November 1950. The Convention will thus be 70 next autumn. Ghent University’s Human Rights Centre wishes to take the opportunity of this anniversary to take stock […]

  • Laurens Lavrysen

New journal: ECHR Law Review

November 29, 2019

It doesn’t happen every day that a new journal is launched in the area of human rights law, let alone one that focuses exclusively on European Convention law. Looking forward to reading the new ECHR Law Review, edited by regular Strasbourg Observers blogger Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou and by Vassilis Tzevelekos. More info on the aim of […]

  • Strasbourg Observers

The Best and Worst ECtHR judgments of 2018 are…

February 25, 2019

Dear readers, A month ago, we launched our yearly vote for best and worst ECtHR judgment of the year (for a shortlist of the candidates, see our previous blog post). Today, it is our pleasure to announce the winners. In the category of best judgment of the year 2018, the winner is…

  • Strasbourg Observers

Poll: Best and Worst ECtHR Judgment of 2018

January 29, 2019

Dear readers, At the start of the New Year, we traditionally like to seize the moment and assess the past year of Strasbourg jurisprudence. For this purpose, we are hereby launching our poll for the best and worst ECtHR judgment of 2018. We would like to warmly encourage you, our readers, to participate in our […]

  • Guest Blogger

Magyar Jeti Zrt v. Hungary: the Court provides legal certainty for journalists that use hyperlinks

January 18, 2019

By Carl Vander Maelen (research group Law & Technology, Ghent University) On 4 December 2018 the European Court of Human Rights (‘the Court’) found a violation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights in Magyar Jeti Zrt v. Hungary. The case concerns the imposition of objective liability for posting a hyperlink leading […]

  • Guest Blogger

Basra v. Belgium: a structural problem struck from the list

November 05, 2018

By Marjan Claes (NANSEN), Charlotte Coenen (NANSEN), Ellen Desmet (UGent), Sylvie Saroléa (UCL) On 13 September 2018, the European Court of Human Rights struck the application of Basra v. Belgium out of its list. Mr. Basra argued not having benefited from an effective remedy in the sense of article 13 ECHR, with respect to his […]

  • Guest Blogger

Mammadov v. Azerbaijan: It Is about Effectiveness of the Strasbourg System.

June 15, 2018

By Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou (University of Liverpool) Infringement proceedings: the question of legitimacy In 2010, when Protocol 14 entered into force, it amended Article 46 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECtHR). Section 4 was added to this Article. It empowered the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to initiate infringement proceedings before […]

  • Strasbourg Observers

Announcement Grassrootsmobilise Conference and Public Event (Athens, 3-4 May)

April 06, 2018

On Friday 4 May 2018, the Grassrootsmobilise Programme organizes a conference “Between state and citizen: religion at the ECtHR”, preceded by a public event on Thursday 3 May on “Religion and Secularism: does the Court go too far – or not far enough?” Strasbourg Observer Prof. Dr. Eva Brems participates in the latter event. This […]

  • Laurens Lavrysen

Seminar “Positive obligations under the ECHR and the Criminal Law: towards a Coercive Human Rights Law?”

March 27, 2018

Dear readers, Together with Dr. Natasa Mavronicola (University of Birmingham), I’m co-organizing an expert seminar on “Positive obligations under the ECHR and the Criminal Law: towards a Coercive Human Rights Law?”, which will take place in Ghent on 25 May 2018. The European Court of Human Rights increasingly requires States to protect ECHR rights by […]

1 2 3 5